Locals oppose deep sea port project, fearing a repeat of Mab Ta Phut problems

Over 500 Satun residents oppose the Pak Bara deep-sea port project for fear of impacts on the environment and local livelihoods, as has happened in the Mab Ta Phut Eastern Seaboard.

On 2 July, the local people in Satun held a demonstration around the town in opposition to the Pak Bara deep-sea port project, and went to the provincial hall to submit a petition to PM Abhisit Vejjajiva.

Dr Samruam Danprachankul, of the provincial public health authority, received the petition on behalf of the provincial governor.

According to the opponents, a huge development scheme is planned for the province, following the deep-sea port.  They fear that it will have irreversible impacts on the local people in terms of religion, culture, livelihood and the environment.

The opposition is led by Aree Tingwang and Phuron Malasai from an artisanal fishery network, Sayun Srinoi from the Council of Political Development, Somyos Tohlang from the People’s Network for Development Watch, and Ananya Sanglee from a local consumers’ group.

They said the development scheme would massively exploit natural resources, including sand and quarry material, and damage the environment.

They found that the Marine Department is seeking a permit to use 7,000 rai of the Phetra archipelago, which is a national park, for the construction of the Pak Bara deep-sea port.

They asked the PM to review the project and delay construction to allow scrutiny according to the law and the 2007 Constitution.

The scheme includes the construction of a dual-track railway to connect the Gulf of Thailand and the Andaman Coast, a coast-to-coast oil pipeline, an oil depot occupying 5,000 rai at La-ngu Gulf, large-scale industrial estates, and an underground tunnel in the province.   

Comments

(moved) john francis lee For

(moved)

For some reason you are not allowing comments to Locals oppose deep sea port project, fearing a repeat of Mab Ta Phut problems so I am commenting here...

This is the reason there must be an election quickly.

The present government represents the interests of global capital... as can be seen in its incessant push for the toxic operations in Map Ta Phut to resume and in its utter disregard for the consequences of those operations to the Thal land and people... and so must not be allowed to make such momentous decisions.

Decisions of this moment must be undertaken by an elected government, and the sooner an election is held the sooner we will have one.

The peoples of Lanna, Isaan,

The peoples of Lanna, Isaan, and Patani... all of Thailand outside of Siam... have a common problem : the Siamese Amat. The Siamese Amat are the compradors of global capital. They have no real links to Thailand, other than the fantasy that they own it and can "dispose" of it as they wish.

The peoples of Lanna, Isaan, Patani, the peoples of all Thailand need to make common cause to take back their country from the clutches of global capital administered by the Siamese Amat.

Reinstate the 1997 Constitution, strengthen its decentralization provisions, deconstruct Siam and reconstruct Thailand.

Gothom to lead peace march

Gothom to lead peace march

A peace march from Bangkok to the deep South to arouse public awareness of the problems in the restive region and to promote the use of peaceful means to resolve the conflicts down there will kick off this coming Sunday July 11.

The 1,100 kilometre long march which will go through 11 provinces from Bangkok to Pattani, one of the three violence-prone southernmost provinces is to be led by Gothom Arya, director of the Centre for the Study and Development of Peace at Mahidol University.

The peace march from July 11 to September 1 is timed to coincide with the Buddhist Lent which is due on July 27 and the fasting month of Ramadan of the Muslims, said Mr Gothom.

Initially joining the march will be Gothom, a group of volunteers and Dr Pramual Pengcharoen, a former lecturer in philosophy and religious affairs of the Humanities Faculty of Chiangmai University who used to take a long march from Chiang Mai to his hometown in Koh Samui, Surat Thani province. Dr Pramual has authored a book, titled “Peace March”.

“This activity is intended to send a message to people in the southern border provinces to come out to demand peaceful means to resolve the conflicts. It is also intended to a message to people outside the region to understand the root causes of the conflicts,” said Gothom.

People living in the 11 provinces along the route of the peace march are welcome to join the march.

Short notice but an excellent opportunity for folks from Lanna and Isaan to join iin and make common cause with their brothers and sisters all along the way as well as at the end of the road!

Anyone seen Anand's list and

Anyone seen Anand's list and report, rejected by the NEB?

See List of harmful activities faces further review

The Administrative Court put a halt to the expansion of Map Ta Phut because, although the pollution of the surrounding area was totally out of control, the government had not implemented the mechanism for monitoring and controlling polluting industries required by the 2007 constitution.

What was specifically required was a review board including local participation independent of government control.

This Comprador Regime immediately set about trying to restart the lethal, laissez faire non-system under government non-control established to service its patrons, the multinationals who had relocated their most toxic operations to Thailand rather than retool them as required by countries with democratic governments.

The National Environment Board (NEB) called on the reliable Anand to "form a committee" to create a list of activities to be overseen independently of government control, as specified in the 2007 constitution.

Anand's committee reported, delivered its list, and the multinationals had the NEB reject it.

The NEB remanded the list to be emended to the multinationals' specifications at the Natural Resources and Environment Ministry.

The Bangkok Post did not print Anand's list, no doubt prohibited by the Comprador Regime from doing so.

Anyone seen Anand's list and report, rejected by the National Environment Board?

Sanan confident of dam's


Sanan confident of dam's approval

Deputy Prime Minister Sanan Kachornprasart is confident the cabinet will approve the long-delayed construction of Kaeng Sua Ten dam in Phrae province after Mahidol University completes its study.

A provincial source said a large number of villagers from tambon Sa-iab in Song district planned to stage another rally against the dam in front of the Phrae city hall on Thursday, July 15.

Kaeng Sua Ten back into the field of play

The question is whether the government is ready to make another enemy and to create another problem while the red shirt movement still remains a threat and while it is overwhelmed with a host of pressing problems.

Just for the sake of reconciliation alone, it is better that the project be shelved once again.

A Dinosaur of Thai Patronage Politics

In 1989, in the wake of country’s worst natural disasters, typhoon Gay, the large extent of illegal logging, piled up in provincial capitals, was revealed. A nationwide logging ban, ordered by an agriculture minister Sanan, revoked forestry concessions and resulted in the destruction of more forests. Critics charged Sanan Kachornprasart of personally benefitting from the ban, citing his reported connections to illegal logging hideouts. Sanan of course flatly denied the allegations.

Villagers burn effigy of pro-dam Sanan

PHRAE : Villagers of tambon Sa-iab opposed to the controversial Kaeng Sua Ten dam project have burned an effigy of Deputy Prime Minister Sanan Kachornprasart, who wants to revive the project.

About 20,000 rai of teak forest in the Mae Yom National Park will be submerged if the dam is built. Sa-iab villagers have fought for almost 20 years to protect the forest, a source of food and herbs.

Nothing counts for The Regime but lining their pockets at the expense of the Thai land and the Thai people.

Checking in on the Map Ta

Checking in on the Map Ta Phut industrial estate impasse

Bangkok, 18 July 2010 - With the dramatic political unrest that unfolded here in Bangkok during April and May, it may be easy to lose sight of a pressing business-related issue still facing Thailand: the ongoing Map Ta Phut industrial estate impasse.

Thailand’s Air: Toxic Cocktail

Bangkok, 6 October 2005 - This report documents the extremely dangerous levels of hazardous air pollution present in residential areas surrounding Map Ta Phut Industrial Estates. Five air samples were taken over a 5-month period to represent the all too numerous chemical odour releases that take place routinely.

    Some of the most shocking findings include:

  1. Benzene (known human cancer causing agent) detected in 4 of the 5 samples exceeded the US EPA Annual Ambient Air Screening Level by as much as 60 times.
  2. Vinyl Chloride (known human cancer causing agent) detected in 2 samples exceeded the EPA Annual Ambient Air Screening Level by as much as 86 times.
  3. 1,2-Dichloroethane (EDC) (known probable human cancer causing agent) detected in 2 samples exceeded the EPA Annual Ambient Air Screening Level by as much as 3,378 times.
  4. Chloroform (known probable human cancer causing agent) detected in a sample was in excess of the EPA Annual Ambient Air Screening Level by 119 times.
  5. A total of 20 different toxic chemicals were identified in the five air samples.
  6. At least 6 up to 12 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and sulphur compounds were detected in each sample, and at least 2 of the toxic chemicals in each sample are in excess of one or more health protective standards or screening levels, giving proof the toxic cocktail inhaled in Map Ta Phut.

Cut Map Ta Phut pollution

Cut Map Ta Phut pollution now: expert

Bangkok, 7 February 2007 - A specialist on occupational diseases has urged agencies to urgently eliminate pollution in Map Ta Phut...

"If you allow the pollutants to be in the environment, it means you give it time to kill people," he said.

On January 11, the PCD asked the National Environmental Board to declare Map Ta Phut industrial complex... as a pollution-control zone under the 1992 Environmental Protection Act.

Such a declaration would allow the PCD to control emission levels of factories within the zone, while the area could not be used for a third phase of petrochemical-industry development as planned.

The board, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister and Industry Minister Kosit Panpiemras, rejected the proposal and set up two subcommittees to study the relationship between illnesses and pollutants...

Uthai Janthima, governor of the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand, welcomed the board's decision.


Residents have DNA damage

Bangkok, 14 Augut 2007 - A new university study reveals residents living near Map Ta Phut industrial estates in Rayong exhibit greater DNA damage than normal... 187 participants... exhibited greater-than-normal DNA damage.

Among the study participants, six students and five adults exhibited damage to between 25 and 30 cells in every 1,000 cells - or 2.5 to three times the average.

damaged cells / 1000 %
25 - 30 2.72%
10 - 15 14.60%
15 - 20 5.69%
 5 - 10 23.27%

The results are similar to those in a joint International Agency for Research on Cancer and National Cancer Institute of Thailand study conducted nine years ago.

In 1998 the World Health Organisation's agency and the national institute studied carcinogen damage in DNA of 81 Map Ta Phut industrial-estate employees, 71 nearby residents and 50 others.

It found damage in workers and residents was 1.9 and 1.4 times higher than in people from other areas.

Environmental Problems in Map

Environmental Problems in Map Ta Phut

Bangkok, 11 January 2007 - The rapid development and continuous expansion of industries in the Map Ta Phut area have posed a negative impact on the environment and the community’s quality of life. Major problems during the past few years can be summarized as follows:

  • 2000-2003: Disturbing smell from petrochemical and refinery factories ...
  • 2005: Drought and water shortage brought about a competition for water resources between the community and the industrial sector...
  • 2007-Present: Environmental impact in the Map Ta Phut area – including health problems, shallow-well water contamination and the evaporation of organic compounds – led non-governmental organizations (NGOs) to call on the government to declare Map Ta Phut a pollution control area.

In an attempt to ensure effective implementation to solve the problem in the Map Ta Phut area, the National Environment Board – at the... special session held on 11 January 2007 – passed a resolution to appoint an Ad-Hoc Sub-Committee to solve pollution problems and to determine the development direction for Rayong province. These development directions were used as guidelines for the formulation and supervision of the Action Plan on Pollution Mitigation and Elimination in Rayong Area, 2007-2011. This Action Plan has the following fundamental objectives:

  1. To reduce the emission of air and water pollution as well as the disposal of solid and industrial waste according to or better than legal requirements
  2. To improve the water and air quality to an acceptable level within one year
  3. To provide health care, treatment and rehabilitation to the public in a fair and thorough manner
  4. To enhance the community’s continuous participation in the monitoring and inspecting of environmental quality and the generation of pollution at source
  5. To ensure future area development will not affect the environment and public’s health and that this development will be in accordance with the area’s potential

In Industrial Thailand,

In Industrial Thailand, Health and Business Concerns Collide

New York, 18 December 2009 -Two years ago, a group of [Map Ta Phut] residents decided to take their health grievances to the courts... The lawsuit, filed by 27 villagers, has become a landmark in Thailand’s environmental movement...

The judgments stunned foreign investors, infuriated powerful Thai companies and... [t]he Thai Chamber of Commerce has warned that if the injunction against dozens of projects is not lifted soon, the Thai economy could suffer for the next decade.

But from the perspective of Srisuwan Janya, the lawyer who won the case, the injunction signaled a new dawn in the country’s development and the end of an era in which Thailand’s paramount objective was bolstering gross domestic product.

“From now on, industries will not only care about making money,” said Mr. Srisuwan, who comes from a family of rice farmers. “They have to care about the environment and the well-being of the people in the community.”

Air contamination in Map Ta Phut still exceeds standard

BANGKOK, 30 June 2010 (NNT) – The air pollution level in the Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate in the eastern province of Rayong still exceeds an acceptable limit while the private sector is encouraged to help control emission of industrial fumes.

Director General of the Pollution Control Department Supat Wangwongwatana said the average quantity of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in the air measured at 7 spots in Map Ta Phut was still higher than the standard level.

The amount of the organic compound benzene found contaminated in the air is higher than the standard at 5 out of the 7 locations while that of 1,3-butadiene is at 0.8 micrograms per cubic meter, higher than the 0.33 micrograms standard. The concentration of 1,2-dichloroethane has been detected to be as high as 4.0 micrograms compared to the acceptable level of 1.7 micrograms.

Is twenty years of degradation of Thai health, Thai lives, and Thai land a a pressing business-related issue... or an urgent question of human rights?

Villagers oppose coal-fired

Villagers oppose coal-fired power plant

The villagers demanded the National Power Supply Company Limited, the project’s owner, move its planned power plant elsewhere.

They said the province’s industrial estate was surrounded by large local agricultural communities and is situated near the Khao Hin Sawn Education and Development Centre, a development project initiated by His Majesty the King, according to the reports.

They were concerned that the power plant would degrade the environment, create health problems and affect their way of living, as local people living in Mae Moh of Lampang and Map Ta Phut of Rayong were experiencing now.

The environmental impact assessment report of the 540-megawatt power plant was approved in late 2009. The project operator planned to build the plant inside the No304 industrial estate of the eastern province.

The regressive "elite" push forward with another viciously polluting lignite fired power plant, further despoiling Thailand and the lives of Thais in order to keep the Amart wearing sweaters in their frigid offices in the colonial capital. They sit safe behind closed, bullet-proof windows, and ride in air-conditioned cars to air-conditioned homes at the end of the day.

Let the Thais breathe sulphur and ash amid the ruined countryside... paradise lost!

Willfully destroyed for a few pennies gain, to allow the construction of inhuman dwellings, mortagaged, uninhabitable without air-conditioning, stupidity on stilts, alienating a deracinated people in the midst of what should be paradise regained.

Show of hands against oil

Show of hands against oil projects

SURAT THANI : Tens of thousands of protesters yesterday formed a human link around Koh Samui to show their opposition to four oil exploration projects, heralding what they say could lead to a protracted legal battle.

Tens of thousands? The Bangkok Post is given to minimizing dissent at all costs... yet it says tens of thousands?

Clearly "oil spills" are topical with BP's ongoing debacle in the Gulf of Mexico having released hundreds of millions of barrels of oil into the waters of the Gulf of Mexico, with decades of damage done and ongoing, but still... tens of thousands... in Surat Thani : home of mobbed up mafia boss, Democrat politician Suthep himself?

If we put one and one together, two will finally flash in our brains and we will realize that the the present Military + Democrat Regime = the compradors of global and domestic capital, and have zero interest in Thailand other as a resource to exploit and despoil, the Thai people included.

Then real resistance to The Regime can arise and arisen, can drive the compradors from power, inaugurate democracy in Thailand, and turn the government's attention to the needs and concerns of the Thai people, who overwhelmingly live outside of the present, colonial capital in Bangkok.

Revolutions are not brought about by old people but by young people. Let them arise and take back their country before the truly old and decrepit of the ancien régime have irrevocably destroyed it.

The future belongs to the young

Oil exploration off Samui to

Oil exploration off Samui to go ahead: Energy minister

Energy Minister Wannarat Charnukul said Friday that the ministry could not terminate the four oil exploration concessions off the Samui resort island as demanded by local residents.

Wannarat explained that the concession holders have not breached the laws and have not caused serious environmental damage so far so the concessions could not be terminated.

Of course the question is whether The Regime has breached the law in offering oil exploration concessions in the face of such opposition from the people.

Clearly the government has gone "over the heads" of the local people once again, as it has done at Map Ta Phut, as it intends to do at Keng Sua Dten.

The concessions so granted are no more valid than if they had been granted by the de facto regime in Burma rather than the de facto regime in Thailand.

Causing possible harm The

Causing possible harm

The NEB has listed a list of eleven harmful acivities which will be required to conduct public hearings, environmental and health impact assessments (EIAs and HIAs) and submit the project for review by the independent body on health and environment.

  1. Land reclamation projects of over 300 rai, excluding beach rehabilitation projects.
  2. All types of mining, excluding gold mining operations in the compound of a smelting plant.
  3. Industrial estate projects, or any land development for industrial purposes.
  4. All types of petrochemical plant, or those expanding production by up to 35% from existing output of 100 tons or more.
  5. All types of mineral smelting or metal forging plants with a daily output of 5,000 tons or more.
  6. Production, disposal, or configuration of all sizes of radioactive substances.
  7. Hazardous waste disposal or incineration plants of all sizes, except concrete incinerators that use hazardous waste as supplemenary material or fuel.
  8. Airport runway extensions of 3000 meters or more.
  9. Ports with jetty length of 300 meters or ports with water channels or ports for loading harmful chemical substances or hazardous waste of up to 25,000 tons a month.
  10. Dams and reservoirs exceeding 100 million cubic meters in size, or reservoirs covering an area of 15 sq km or more.
  11. Poewer plants including: more than 100-MW coal-fired plants, 150-MW biomass plants, 3000-MW combined-cycle or co-generation systems, and nuclear power plants of all sizes.

A four-party panel formed to solve pollution problems in the Map Ta Phut area on the Eastern Seaboard... proposed the listing of 18 project types as harmful.

The NEB resolved yesterday to list 11 projects, including petrochemical industry expansion, mining, power plants, dams and airport runway expansion.

The seven project types dropped from the list include projects located in world heritage sites, irrigation works, pumping underground salt, and inter-river basin water diversion.

Thongchai Panswad, chief of the Anand panel's subcommittee on the drafting of the list of harmful activities, said industrial operators would have a better picture of what types of project needed to comply with Section 67.

"However, the board should explain clearly to the public the exclusion of seven items from the list," he said.

I post the above because the

I post the above because the information therein was contained in a "picture" published by the Bangkok Post.

This is the BPost's latest and preferred means of making information hard to copy. One must re-type by hand the information contained to make it available as ordinary text. The BPost is truly a despicable organization.

Note the last line :

However, the board should explain clearly to the public the exclusion of seven items from the list."

The despicable BPost doesn't even publish the seven items excluded from the list!

  1. projects located in world heritage sites
  2. irrigation works
  3. pumping underground salt
  4. inter-river basin water diversion
  5. ?
  6. ?
  7. ?

As well, Anand cut 2 more items before sumitting his list to the NEB:

  1. golf courses and
  2. genetically modified organisms

It seems clear to me that golf courses are home free because they're built by generals, and that genetically modified organisms are home free(!!!) because the US will break your legs if they're not.

In April this year, a temporary screening organisation proposed by the Anand panel was announced. It will be valid for two years or until a permanent independent organisation is established.

"[Section 67] allows communities to file complaints against activities that are not included in the list," he [Buddhipongse Punnakanta, an adviser to the Industry Minister] said.

"So even though we have a list, if communities are still not confident in it, they will still be able to file a complaint, resulting in the need for those activities to still conduct EIAs and HIAs."

The Thai land and people have been set up once again for devastation and exploitation.

It seems clear to me that communities will have to file a complaint to conduct EIAs and HIAs for the vast majority of projects the Bangkok "elite" will try to push through on behalf of their patrons : domestic and international capital.

Top 20 Environmental

Top 20 Environmental Depredations
  by Abhisit and his Compradors

  1. Golf courses anywhere in Thailand whether built on prime agricultural land or using scarce water resources elsewhere : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  2. Man-made mutant plants or animals of any description : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  3. Land "reclamation projects" of under 300 rai, or beach "rehabilitation projects" of any description : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  4. Gold mining operations carried out by leaching vast quantities of "spoils" with hydrogen cyanide behind closed gates at "a smelting plant" : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  5. Industrial estate projects, or any land development for industrial purposes : EIAs and HIAs actually required?!
  6. Petrochemical plant expanding production by up to 35% from existing output of up to 100 tons : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  7. All types of mineral smelting or metal forging plants with a daily output less than 5,000 tons : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  8. Production, disposal, or configuration of all sizes of radioactive substances : EIAs and HIAs actually required?!
  9. Concrete incinerators that use hazardous waste as supplemenary material or fuel : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  10. Airport runway extensions of less than 3000 meters : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  11. Ports with jetty length of less than 300 meters or ports with water channels(?!) or ports for loading harmful chemical substances or hazardous waste of less than 25,000 tons a month : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  12. Dams and reservoirs not exceeding 100 million cubic meters in size, or reservoirs covering an area of not more than 15 sq km : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  13. Poewer plants including: up to 100-MW coal-fired plants, up to 150-MW biomass plants, up to 3000-MW combined-cycle or co-generation systems : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  14. Projects located in world heritage sites : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  15. Irrigation works : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  16. Pumping underground salt : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  17. Inter-river basin water diversion : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  18. ? : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  19. ? : no EIAs or HIAs required.
  20. ? : no EIAs or HIAs required.

Map Ta Phut activity could

Map Ta Phut activity could resume in 2 weeks

Industrial projects in Map Ta Phut that are clear of the list of harmful activities should be able to resume operations within two weeks, says Buddhipongse Punnakanta, an adviser to Industry Minister Chaiwuti Bannawat.

The Regime certainly seems to be public enemy number one in Thailand.

Clearly The Regime has no interest at all in Thai land or Thai lives. It's only interest is in acting as a good and loyal comprador for domestic and international capital, which flocks to Thailand to build chemical plants because other countries' governments value their environment and their people and would never allow them to poison both with absolute impunity as they do here.

What can be said of a Regime like this? It is plainly contemptuous of the people of Thailand, in line with the foreign origin of all of the Bangkok "elite". They have been plundering Suvarnabhumi and murdering the "Thai" people for a thousand years at least and feel that it is their right and "duty" to continue to do so.

The Regime certainly does seem to be public enemy number one in Thailand.

The People's Network of the

The People's Network of the East will rally in Rayong tomorrow in protest of The Regime's sell-out at Map Ta Phut of their health and the Thai environment to global and domestic capital.

Korbsak in Rayong to resolve MTP problems

The network is not happy with the Central Administrative Court's verdict to allow projects that are not included in the National Resources and Environment Ministry's list of 11 harmful projects to resume operations and has announced plans for a protest at the industrial estate on Thursday.

The network wants the government to declare 18 -- not 11 -- industrial activities as having a serious impact on people's health and the environment.

The court ruled earlier this month that 74 of the 76 projects it suspended earlier were not on the harmful list... It allowed the 74 projects to resume operations, which displeased activists and the network.

The Bangkok Post has NEVER even published the 7 industrial activities identified by Anand's committee as "having a serious impact on people's health and the environment" that the toady, capitalist compradors in The Regime summarily dropped from Anand's committee's recommendations on orders from their neo-liberal capitalist bosses.

Cannot Prachatai publish the full, original list of the Anand committee?

I had to reach back to July to find a story even obliquely referring to Map Ta Phut to hang my RFC upon.

I realize that Prachatai has a very full plate, yet I still make an RFC, a Request For Coverage, of The Regime's continued depredations of the Thai environment and the health of the Thai people.

An article arguing that anthropologists ought to consider journalism as an application for their training and expertise states :

Muckrake Your Town

The environmental health beat must be a central focus of any new paper or Internet site. It is one of the most important issues of our times.

Levi-Strauss said that ". . . .Nothing is settled; everything can still be altered. What was done, but turned out wrong, can be done again. 'The Golden Age, which blind superstition had placed behind (or ahead of) us, is in us.'"

Thailand can be put back together again. It's the government, not the environment, that needs deconstruction.